🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the earlier contest. However Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Not even Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election we reported on if the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the disparities exist.