🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a proposal lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a good foundation," said the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by conclusive data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for young users," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more measured position. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

While this global conversation evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.