{'It’s like they’ve erupted out of someone’s subconscious': how horror has come to dominate contemporary film venues.
The biggest jump-scare the film industry has encountered in 2025? The return of horror as a main player at the UK film market.
As a genre, it has remarkably surpassed earlier periods with a 22% year-on-year increase for the British and Irish cinemas: over £83 million this year, against £68.6 million last year.
“Previously, zero horror films made £10 million in the UK or Ireland. Currently, five have surpassed that mark,” says a box office editor.
The major successes of the year – a recent horror title (£11.4m), Sinners (£16.2m), The Conjuring Last Rites (£14.98m) and 28 Years Later (£15.54 million) – have all stayed in the cinemas and in the public consciousness.
Even though much of the expert analysis highlights the unique excellence of renowned filmmakers, their successes suggest something evolving between viewers and the genre.
“Viewers often remark, ‘This is a must-see regardless of your genre preferences,’” explains a head of acquisition.
“Such movies experiment with style and format to produce entirely fresh content, connecting with viewers on a new level.”
But outside of artistic merit, the steady demand of spooky films this year suggests they are giving audiences something that’s greatly desired: catharsis.
“Currently, cinema mirrors the widespread anger, fear, and societal splits,” notes a horror podcast host.
“The genre masterfully exploits common anxieties, magnifying them so that everyday stresses fade beside the cinematic horror,” says a respected writer of vampire and monster cinema.
In the context of a real-world news cycle featuring conflict, immigration issues, political shifts, and climate concerns, witches, zombies and vengeful spirits connect in new ways with filmg oers.
“Some research suggests vampire film popularity correlates with financial downturns,” states an actress from a successful fright film.
“The concept reflects how economic systems can drain vitality from individuals.”
Historically, public discord has always impacted scary movies.
Scholars highlight the surge of early cinematic styles after the first world war and the turbulent times of the post-war Germany, with features such as classic silent horror and a pioneering fright film.
This was followed by the 1930s depression and Universal Studios’ Frankenstein and The Wolfman.
“The classic example is Dracula: you get this invasion of Britain by someone from eastern Europe who then causes this infection that gets spread in all sorts of ways and threatens the Anglo-Saxon heroes,” notes a academic.
“Therefore, it embodies concerns related to foreign influx.”
The phantom of migration influenced the newly launched rural fright a recent film title.
Its writer-director clarifies: “I aimed to delve into populist rhetoric. Specifically, calls to restore a mythical past that favored a privileged few.”
“Additionally, the notion that acquaintances might unexpectedly voice extreme views, leaving others shocked.”
Arguably, the current era of praised, culturally aware scary films began with a brilliant satire launched a year after a divisive leadership period.
It ushered in a new wave of visionary directors, including a range of talented artists.
“That period was incredibly stimulating,” recalls a creator whose movie about a murderous foetus was one of the time's landmark films.
“In my view, it marked the start of a phase where filmmakers embraced wildly creative horror with artistic ambitions.”
The same filmmaker, who is writing a new horror original, adds: “Over 10 years, audiences’ minds have been opening up to much more of that.”
Simultaneously, there has been a reconsideration of the overlooked scary films.
Earlier this year, a new cinema opened in London, showing cult classics such as The Greasy Strangler, The Fall of the House of Usher and the late-80s version of Dr Caligari.
The fresh acclaim of this “raw and chaotic” genre is, according to the theater owner, a clear response to the formulaic productions pumped out at the theaters.
“It counters the polished content from big producers. The industry has become blander and more foreseeable. Numerous blockbusters share the same traits,” he says.
“On the other hand, [these indie works] feel imperfect. They seem to burst forth from deep creativity, free from commercial constraints.”
Scary movies continue to challenge the norm.
“They have this strange ability to seem old fashioned and up to the minute, both at the same time,” notes an expert.
Alongside the revival of the deranged genius archetype – with several renditions of a classic novel imminent – he predicts we will see scary movies in 2026 and 2027 reacting to our current anxieties: about AI’s dominance in the coming decades and “supernatural elements in political spheres”.
In the interim, a biblical fright story The Carpenter’s Son – which narrates the tale of Mary and Joseph’s struggles after the nativity, and features celebrated stars as the holy parents – is scheduled to debut later this year, and will certainly send a ripple through the faith-based groups in the US.</