🔗 Share this article

As a Dungeon Master, I usually avoided extensive use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying games. My preference was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice as opposed to pure luck. However, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very glad I did.

The Spark: Watching an Improvised Tool

An influential streamed game features a DM who often calls for "luck rolls" from the players. This involves choosing a type of die and outlining consequences contingent on the number. While it's essentially no distinct from rolling on a random table, these are devised in the moment when a character's decision doesn't have a clear outcome.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own table, mainly because it seemed novel and offered a break from my usual habits. The experience were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated tension between pre-determination and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional In-Game Example

In a recent session, my party had concluded a city-wide fight. Afterwards, a player asked about two key NPCs—a pair—had lived. Instead of deciding myself, I let the dice decide. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This led to a incredibly poignant sequence where the characters found the corpses of their friends, forever clasped together in death. The party held a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to earlier roleplaying. As a final touch, I improvised that the remains were miraculously transformed, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I rolled for, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the party lacked to solve another pressing quest obstacle. It's impossible to script such serendipitous story beats.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This incident made me wonder if chance and thinking on your feet are in fact the core of D&D. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt need exercise. Adventurers reliably excel at upending the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and create content in the moment.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to train these talents without going completely outside your preparation. The key is to deploy them for low-stakes situations that have a limited impact on the campaign's main plot. For instance, I would avoid using it to establish if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. However, I could use it to determine if the party arrive right after a key action occurs.

Enhancing Player Agency

This technique also serves to make players feel invested and foster the feeling that the game world is dynamic, shaping based on their choices in real-time. It prevents the perception that they are merely characters in a rigidly planned script, thereby enhancing the cooperative foundation of roleplaying.

This philosophy has historically been integral to the game's DNA. Early editions were enamored with encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Although current D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the required method.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. However, equally valid no problem with relinquishing control and letting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Direction is a significant factor in a DM's responsibilities. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to cede it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of advice is this: Do not fear of relinquishing a bit of control. Try a little chance for minor details. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you could have pre-written in advance.